Caibidil:
Access to the planning process and submissions is unnecessarily difficult and exclusionary. For true citizen engagement, a plain text version of the document should have been available with area specific documents produced based on the mapped objectives.
It is public consultation in name only if barriers are placed to participation. I would suggest that a legal document 556 pages long is not the best way to engage the public. If the city council truly wanted to get public opinion on the development plan I don't believe you would go about it in this way. This is something that should be considered for the next phase of public consultation.
Main requests:
Make future processes easier for people to engage with